Attorneys at Law
Attorneys
Peter OffenbecherPeter Offenbecher

Peter Offenbecher is a principal in the firm. His practice focuses on criminal defense in federal and state courts. For over 30 years, Peter has provided the highest quality legal representation to clients facing the full spectrum of state and federal criminal charges. Peter provides legal advice to businesses and individuals facing investigations and inquiries from federal and state regulatory agencies, as well as vigorous representation at the trial and appellate stages of the criminal justice system.

Peter is admitted to practice in the federal and state courts in Washington and California. He is also admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Peter’s professional activities have included appointment to the Washington Supreme Court Committees on pattern jury instructions and qualifications of lawyers in death penalty cases. Peter has been a frequent presenter on topics of interest to criminal defense lawyers and is an active member of professional organizations, including the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. Since 2001, Washington Law and Politics magazine has awarded Peter its “Super Lawyer” designation for white collar criminal defense.

Selected Trial Court Work

  • In re Major Educational Health Care Organization (representation of Manager of Regulatory Compliance for major regional medical organization regarding wide-ranging federal grand jury investigation of alleged extensive health care fraud; two physician chiefs of major departments pled guilty to felony crimes; no charges filed against my client).
  • In re Luxury Product Importing Corporation (representation of luxury product importing business in five-year federal grand jury investigation based on allegations of pervasive violations of Customs, Commerce Department, and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearm regulations; case resolved by civil penalty; no criminal charges filed).
  • In re State University Foundation (with law partner, represented University Foundation in all aspects of the failed effort by the Foundation to construct a new urban campus for the University; the matter was long and complex, involving civil and criminal claims against the Foundation’s attorneys and University’s executives; there was a state Attorney General’s investigation, a Federal Grand Jury Investigation, state bar investigations and protracted civil litigation against the developer, law firms and others. We conducted the internal investigations and represented the Foundation in more than four years of investigations, litigation and grand jury proceedings.)
  • United States v. Y.M. (federal criminal prosecution for violation of customs and export and import regulations after defendant, who was subject to a Commerce Department Export Denial Order, exported military-style goods to Macedonia; jury hung strongly in favor of acquittal; case dismissed with prejudice).
  • United States v. J.C. (federal criminal prosecution of Canadian citizen for participation in a conspiracy to smuggle marijuana across the border by helicopter; case dismissed during hearing on motion to suppress evidence after defense investigation and cross examination disclosed serious credibility issues with arresting border patrol agents).
  • State v. P.S. (state criminal prosecution of police officer for videotaped alleged assault of female teenager in custody at police station; two jury trials ended in hung juries; prosecution finally dismissed after second jury hung 11-1 for acquittal).
  • Seattle v. J.L. (state criminal prosecution of police officer for videotaped alleged assault of suspect during street arrest; case dismissed after prosecution expert changed his opinion during questioning by defense counsel).
  • P.J. v. T.W. (federal habeas corpus proceeding on behalf of state prisoner sentenced to death; the district court vacated the conviction and sentence because of juror misconduct; the case was eventually settled in state superior court for a sentence of life without parole).
  • D.L.R. v. T.W. (federal habeas corpus proceeding on behalf of state prisoner sentenced to death; this case involved eight years of discovery and evidentiary hearings in United States District Court, a personal restraint petition in the Washington Supreme Court, and three separate sets of appeals and cross-appeals in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, including a successful defense of the State’s interlocutory appeal of the district court’s discovery orders; in 1997, the district court vacated the conviction and death sentence, after which the case was settled in state superior court for a life without parole sentence).
  • United States v. D.L. (federal criminal prosecution of Canadian citizen for transporting large amounts of marijuana across the border in specially manufactured secret compartments of defendant’s truck; case dismissed on motion of Government after defense presentation of evidence demonstrated defendant’s innocence).
  • S.W. v. D.S.H.S. (federal habeas corpus petition by insanity acquittee incarcerated at state mental hospital for twenty years; this case involved years of collateral litigation in Washington State courts, including state habeas proceedings and evidentiary hearings in Superior Court, two appeals to the Washington State Court of Appeals and a State’s Petition for Review to the Washington Supreme Court; in 2003, the underlying judgment was vacated and Mr. W. was released from the state hospital).
  • United States v. A.A., et al. (federal criminal prosecution of three Russian citizens for extortion (audio-taped by the FBI) alleged to have occurred during a goodwill wrestling tour through the Northwest; all three defendants were acquitted).
  • United States v. R.C., et al. (federal criminal prosecution of two defendants for satellite television signal piracy, where both defendants were convicted of some counts and acquitted of the others; all convictions were reversed and my client’s statements were suppressed on appeal, after which all charges against my client were dismissed).
  • United States v. R.V. (federal district court judge modified terms of supervised release to permit Rastafarian defendant to use marijuana for religious ceremonial purposes while on federal probationary supervision after finding that imposition of any sanction for marijuana use would violate the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act).
  • United States v. N.B. (environmental research scientist charged with violating Navy base security regulations for skin diving in prohibited waters to obtain biological samples acquitted at trial after district court found that federal regulations failed to give adequate notice of prohibited conduct).
  • United States v. A.H. (district court granted defendant’s motion to suppress confession and physical evidence seized from defendant’s person because arrest was in violation of Fourth Amendment).
  • United States v. J.S., 649 F. Supp. 1065 (E.D. Wash. 1986) (federal district court granted defendant’s motion to suppress evidence of methamphetamine lab seized by state law enforcement authorities under color of state search warrant; court finds that violation of state law controls and compels suppression in this federal criminal prosecution even though application of federal search and seizure law might require a different result).

Selected Published Appellate Court Work

  • United States v. E.J., No. CR 95-152 WD (federal criminal prosecution for manslaughter where my client handed her daughter a gun to shoot an assaultive boyfriend; Ms. J. was convicted at trial; the conviction was first affirmed on appeal by a three-judge panel, United States v. E.J., 139 F.3d 748 (9th Cir. 1998), then reversed by an eleven-judge panel for failure to permit the defense counsel to introduce documentary evidence corroborating her trial testimony in United States v. E.J., 169 F.3d 1210 (9th Cir. 1999) (en banc), after which the indictment was dismissed with prejudice). (Served as appellate counsel as well as trial counsel.)
  • United States v. E.H., 189 F.3d 785 (9th Cir. 1999) (federal criminal conviction reversed for violation of federal constitutional right to venue in the district where the crime occurred).
  • United States v. A.P., 183 F.3d 1014 (9th Cir. 1999) (federal criminal judgment and sentence vacated because application of United States Sentencing Guideline violated statute prohibiting sentencing enhancement for conviction as to which defendant’s civil rights had been restored by the state).
  • United States v. Doe, 53 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir. 1995) (federal criminal judgment revoking supervised release and imposing sentence vacated because a juvenile sentence under the Federal Juvenile Act may not include a period of supervised release in the absence of specific statutory authorization).
  • United States v. G.L., 963 F.2d 243 (9th Cir. 1992) (federal criminal conviction reversed; a suspect’s request for counsel to state police also invokes his right to counsel when questioned by the FBI for a different offense).
  • United States v. E. D.-M., 951 F.2d 1063 (9th Cir. 1991) (federal criminal conviction reversed; a defendant is entitled to a hearing to determine whether a Speedy Trial Act dismissal should be with or without prejudice).
  • E.C. v. D., 99 Wn.2d 373, 662 P.2d 828 (1983) (order of civil commitment vacated; superior court may not revoke or modify order of commitment in absence of violation of terms of release; strict compliance with statutory requirements is required).
  • State v. M.W., 30 Wash. App. 162, 632 P.2d 913 (1981) (state criminal conviction reversed; defendant has the right to cross-examine the complaining witness concerning her intent to file a civil action for damages against the defendant’s employer based on the facts of the alleged offense).

Awards

  • Lawyer of the Year for Seattle in the area of White Collar Criminal Defense—U.S. News & World Report’s Best Lawyers in America List—September 2014
  • Tier 1 Ranking in the field of Criminal Defense: White Collar Crime, in the U.S. News & World Report’s “Best Law Firms” survey—2014
  • William O. Douglas Award—Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers—2011
  • Recognized in “Superlawyer” Edition of Washington Law and Politics—2001–2014
  • Distinguished Service Award—Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers—1991

Presentations

Topic Year
“The New Federalism: Retooling the Pretext Doctrine” 1991
“Dealing with Prosecutor Misconduct” 1992
“Prosecutorial Misconduct” 1994
“Oral Advocacy on Appeal” 1995
“Defense and Prosecution Ethical Obligations of Disclosure” 1997
“Federal Bail Reform Act: Detention and Preliminary Hearings” 1997
“Ethical Considerations in Representing Government Informants” 1999
“Affirmative Defenses in Federal Court” 2000
“Effective Use of Interpreters in a Criminal Case” 2002
“Litigating Special Administrative Measures in Terrorist Prosecutions” 2003
“A Healthy Practice: Preventative Measures To Keep Your Livelihood Out Of Intensive Care” 2005
“Criminal Enforcement and Regulatory Compliance for Design Professionals: Understanding and Managing the Risks” 2005
“Ethical Issues in the Practice of Criminal Defense” for Oregon Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers 2008
“Ethical Challenges in the Difficult Criminal Case: Lessons from Modern Literature” 2008
“Overcoming Obstacles to Discovery and Investigation in a Federal Criminal Case” 2014

206 623-6501

206 790-3675 cell

Send Email

Download resume

Areas of Practice

  • White Collar Criminal Defense
  • Criminal Defense
  • Defense of Attorney Discipline Proceedings

Education

  • B.A., Political Economy, awarded summa cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, Colorado College, 1976.
  • Thomas J. Watson Fellowship, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1976-1977.
  • J.D., Order of the Coif, University of California at Davis School of Law, 1980.